feasibility study

Illustration of a project manager sitting in front of endless slides and a PowerPoint in a conference room with a look of enlightenment
"There is feasibility, but only if time and budget are abundant…" a series of rituals granting eternal conditional approval.
Money & Work

Description

A feasibility study is a ritual whereby a project seeks divine approval through mountains of slides and endless meetings, eroding participants’ spirits. It dispels any issue with the incantation “further study required,” erecting an impenetrable defense of ambiguity. Valuing process over results, it offers a false talisman of security in place of concrete actions. Those lost in its labyrinth of budgets and timelines wander an analysis forest with no exit. In the end, all that remains is the tragic beauty of uncertainty and paper piles.

Definitions

  • A magical ritual that justifies postponement and escapism to keep a project’s lifeline alive.
  • A self-replicating machine that spawns infinite analyses while deferring answers.
  • A game staking hope ‘maybe it can happen’ to extort time and budget.
  • A handicap providing vague conclusions to satisfy stakeholders.
  • A false sense of security prioritizing document creation over concrete action.
  • Word alchemy that finds value in process rather than results.
  • A trap delaying conclusions and responsibilities at the planning stage.
  • High-end wrapping of inaction in ‘professional analysis’.
  • Alchemy that condenses future uncertainty into an imaginary safe zone.
  • A psychological barrier that distances action through the vanity of inquiry.

Examples

  • “Feasibility study? Oh, you mean that event to build mountains of paper for self-satisfaction.”
  • “The meeting succeeded. The study report, however, remains abandoned in a drawer.”
  • “The findings read ‘depending on effort.’ So basically nothing is decided.”
  • “Budget approved? Yes, but apparently that requires more budget.”
  • “Feasibility deadline? Next month… probably extended to the month after.”
  • “Read the study? It was like a poetic anthology of excuses.”
  • “Conclusion: ‘unknown.’ That’s the ultimate safety measure.”
  • “FS lead? Oh, the cemetery caretaker of proposal documents.”
  • “Six months passed just on studies. When do we start development?”
  • “Did a risk analysis? Sure, the risk was the risk called ‘risk analysis.’”
  • “Which slides to prepare? Probably ‘wishes’ and ‘budget’.”
  • “Review the report? That apparently needs another study.”
  • “Possible or not? That depends on the boss’s mood.”
  • “The data may be unreal, but the PowerPoint is very real.”
  • “How to call FS a success? Prove that nothing is moving.”

Narratives

  • Project A’s feasibility study merely spawned an infinite loop of meetings and slides.
  • The findings concluded with ‘further study required,’ like a refuge in the safety zone.
  • No one moved a finger, but the study documents kept multiplying in a sad equation.
  • The study to secure budget formed a Möbius strip demanding ever more funds.
  • The study lead collected grains of data one by one, building a digital beach.
  • Counting issues was much faster than proving feasibility.
  • FS meetings were Platonic dialogues among those without any solution.
  • The study phase can be seen as the project’s final memorial service.
  • The analysis graphs were like beautiful but barren landscapes.
  • Before reaching a conclusion, the study to draw a conclusion was repeated five times.
  • The FS report became a legend, never read by anyone.
  • Problems spotted during the study turned into a long list of forgotten items afterward.
  • The most important item was ’the necessity of the study.’
  • A feasibility study is a ritual to find who will take responsibility, more than to verify possibility.
  • In the end, the feasibility of the feasibility study itself is questioned.

Aliases

  • Paper Pyramid
  • Meeting Racket
  • Delay Engine
  • Study Labyrinth
  • Analysis Terror
  • Time Thief
  • Infinite Loop Generator
  • Report Hell
  • Future-Guess Scam
  • Responsibility Deferral Device
  • Budget Devourer
  • Fantasy Comfort Pill
  • Meeting Fortress
  • No-Conclusion Conference
  • Study Addiction
  • Hypothesis Testing Society
  • Excuse Conveyor
  • Stakeholder Hospitality Act
  • Question Buffet
  • Altar of Vanity

Synonyms

  • Analysis Black Hole
  • Meeting Paradise
  • Report Furnace
  • Document Graveyard
  • Study Circus
  • Hope Repository
  • Budget Hatchery
  • Pre-project Warmup
  • Responsibility Escape Oil
  • Slide Flood Zone
  • Issue Scatterer
  • Escape in the Name of Validation
  • Planning Addiction
  • Review Festival
  • Phantom Conclusion Hunt
  • Estimate Factory
  • Decision Freeze Device
  • Deadline Magic
  • Analysis Lost Child
  • Data Desert
2026-01-29
business project management feasibility study analysis study

Use the share button below if you liked it.

It makes me smile, when I see it.

Keywords

5 Whys

The 5 Whys is the ultimate ritual of endlessly asking “why?” in the name of problem-solving, delivering meeting extensions instead of actual improvements. Though it purports to uncover root causes, it often only obfuscates accountability and yields conclusions nobody is happy with. In practice, it’s treated like a magic word: utter it enough times and solutions will appear, despite being no more than wordplay. Its paradoxical power lies in making every trivial hiccup seem like a profound issue through its five-tiered interrogation. In the end, the only true outcome is collective exhaustion.

5S

5S is the fivefold chant that transforms the chaos on your desk into an illusion of order. Under the banner of Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain, it veils real inefficiencies behind a neatly arranged façade. This ritual rebrands clutter as compliance and personal workspaces as propaganda billboards. The so-called audits double as surveillance spectacles that satisfy managerial vanity. Once the obvious mess disappears, so do the pressing problems nobody dared to address.

5Why

A method to hunt for the root cause of problems by uttering “Why?” five times in solemn repetition. By the fifth inquiry, participants feel they've reached the very source of evil, though in reality it often spawns superficial blame-shifting. Utter it in meetings and watch as it’s hailed as holy grail of problem solving, yet functions as an excuse generator. Bonus: everyone indulges in the euphoria of “deep analysis” while actual action is promptly postponed.